Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Gore gives it his all

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 November 2009
How the Hatters rated


Shane Gore: 8.5 – Stand-in keeper started shakily but grew into the game. Made some fine saves and couldn't be faulted for the goals.

Keith Keane: 7.5 – Made a real difference. Won plenty in midfield until being forced off at half time.

Alan White: 7.5 – Won plenty in the air and was a rock in the heart of Hatters' defence.

George Pilkington: 7 – Wasted at right-back and struggled when moved into the centre of Town's midfield.

Adam Newton: 7 – Scored a great goal but faded as Luton came under the cosh.

Andy Burgess: 7 – Started so well and was at the heart everything early on, but faded badly.

Shane Blackett: 7 – In the thick of the action for the Hatters, but couldn't hold out under Dale's barrage.

Claude Gnakpa: 6 – Played so well for most of the game, but had nothing left at the end and was a virtual passenger for much of the second half.

Steve Basham: 8 – His best game for the club by a mile. Energetic and deadly in front of goal.

Kevin Gallen: 6 – One of Luton's least effective performers and didn't have the legs to chase the visitors down in the closing stages.

Freddie Murray: 6.5 – Competent all-round show but didn't have the impact he would have liked.

Jake Howells (sub): 5.5 – Ineffective on the left and couldn't help the Hatters climb off the ropes.

Tom Craddock (sub): 6.5 – Lively and full of running, but should have scored to close the game out.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 November 2009 5:30 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Luton
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.